![]() You can sort by it, but it only is able to sort what was on that particular page (ie. Their "pro" version has other useful features. This modifies eBay search pages to include columns with total price. Update: I've run into a highly useful Firefox extension called ShortShip. eBay should just make a strong warning to the low-rep sellers that they should consider this, and even offer it as a service. Often I've seen auctions where the difference in price is quite large, 20% or more, for sellers of reputations under 5. Low rep sellers should be strongly encouraged to offer escrow, at their expense. When the seller has a very low rep, the seller should just automatically assume it's going to be send-merchandise-first, get money later except with very low rep buyers. Who is going to buy from a zero-rep seller? The tradition has been to build up a buyer rep, and then you can sell, which is better than nothing but not perfect. By this I don't mean negative reputation, just having few transactions. There should also be special rules for zero-rep or low-rep sellers. Sellers could always offer this sort of payment, even when the seller is high-rep, to high-rep buyers as an incentive. If the seller's rep is better, or it's even, stick with the current system. I think it would be good on eBay to develop a norm that if the buyer has a better reputation thant he seller, the seller ships first, the buyer pays last. Why should it necessarily be one way or the other? In business, high reputation buyers just send a purchase order, get the item and an invoice, and pay later. The norm is buyer sends liquid money sight unseen to the seller, and the seller sends merchandise. Now let's talk about the reputation dynamics of the transaction. Doesn't help the buyer any but at least removes the incentive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |